Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE

Entries in antiitrust (2)

Thursday
Feb282013

Anti-trust, Chinese style

Remember the probe into China Telecom and China Unicom for alleged anti-competitive behaviour?

The two companies were called out for price discrimination against rival ISPs back in November 2011 - the first such case under the 2007 Anti-Monopoly Law in Chinese telecoms.

Fifteen months on, it remains the only such case and its status is very much a mystery.

A long piece from the Beijing News (posted here on Sina Tech) quotes an anonymous source as saying the investigation “has met with considerable resistance.”

No surprise there. Anti-trust researcher Wang Xiaoye says that the facts of the case are clear. If this had happened in the EU, it already would have been settled, with heavy penalties imposed on the operators.

The two Chinese operators do face potential fines of billions of yuan, but of course the case has to be settled first.

Technically, there isn’t even a formal record of a case.  It came to light through a CCTV interview with a National Development and Reform Commission official. The NDRC is investigating, but has posted nothing on its website. Neither operator has mentioned the case in its financial reports, or made any contingencies for it.

The two operators have reportedly asked for the case to be dropped, and have promised to cut their broadband access fees (though that presumably would only make it harder for their competitors).

In other words, it’s business as usual in Chinese telecoms; the operators and the MIIT a law unto themselves in an environment of zero transparency.

A Zhejiang University professor, Zhao Wei, is quoted in the story as calling this ‘Chinese-style anti-trust.’

This maybe history, but it's worth recalling because the market is liberalising to allow in MVNOs. The MIIT has had almost nothing to say about how it will guarantee the newcomers access to incumbent networks or protect them from price discrimination. Etcetera, etcetera.

Happy New Year of the Snake. Here’s to more of the same.

Thursday
Nov242011

Anti-trust: another round in cable v telecom 

The great thing about China is that just by an inquiry starting, you already know the outcome.

Click to read more ...