21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE

Entries in PCCW (5)


Telstra sells out of CSL

One thing we can say for certain about Telstra’s exit from CSL: that’s the last foreign-controlled telco we will see on Chinese soil.

Telstra’s 76% stake in CSL not only seemed an anomaly in Hong Kong, it seemed anomalous to Telstra. The business fell into its hands as part of the disastrous Reach JV back in 2001 as Richard Li threw assets overboard to stay afloat. 

Unlike Telenor or SingTel, Telstra never made any serious attempt to build offshore mobile business group. Now, on its umpteenth global strategy, it’s focusing on the enterprise/cloud/managed services market. CSL remains the odd man out.

The sale price of $2.43bn (A$2.73bn) is well down on the A$4 billion it paid back in the day, though it represents a A$600mn profit on the marked-down book value.

The other, more striking point in this is HKT’s offer to surrender all of its 3G spectrum in 2016. That includes its own 2x15MHz as well as that of CSL.

HKT says it can do that because it now has access to sub-1GHz frequencies, including 850 MHz and 900 MHz, as well as 1.8 GHz, 2.1 GHz and 2.6 GHz. Additionally, it says it will no longer have to pay the accompanying spectrum fees.

This comes hard on the heels of Ofca's unpopular (with operators at least) instruction that Hong Kong operators to surrender a third of their 3G spectrum for re-auction in 2016.

Whatever the reason, this generosity, surely a first in the history of mobile, does a favour both to Ofca and in particular China Mobile by ensuring a discount on the auction price. Happy Christmas to both of them. 


PCCW, not the China govt, keeping Syria online 

And that's a good thing

Click to read more ...


21Vianet needs HK mobile partner 

To make its planned LTE business work, 21Vianet badly needs friends in Hong Kong. But its choices aren't many.

Click to read more ...


Chinese data centre firm seeks HK spectrum

"Carrier-neutral" data centre player is surprise entrant in 2.3GHz auction

Click to read more ...


Telstra, PCCW put Reach behind them

Almost ten years to the day since it was formed, the troubled Telstra-PCCW JV Reach is being wound up as a major Asian capacity provider.

The two telcos announced today they had agreed to distribute most of Reach's international bandwidth and other assets between them.

Telstra said it would record an initial A$50m ($49.8m) accounting gain on the deal, and another A$80-A$100m on completion.

The companies would not disclose which parts of Reach’s network were being returned to the parents, but said Reach would continue to manage “certain assets” for both PCCW and Telstra.

“The restructuring is expected to result in a clear division of the majority of Reach’s assets and operations, aligning with the respective needs of each of Reach’s shareholders,” PCCW said in its press release.

“The company is expected to benefit, operationally and financially, from the restructuring of Reach through increased operational efficiencies, which are expected to contribute towards a better operating margin and an enhanced competitive position in the market for international connectivity services.

“Further, PCCW is expected to benefit from a recovery of certain assets that were previously invested in Reach.”

Telstra International’s regulatory chief, David Aitken, said it was “better to be master of one’s own destiny.”


Reach’s main assets are the Reach North Asia Loop (RNAL), Australia-Japan and Southern Cross cables. It also owns capacity on APCN2, Sea-Me-We 3, China US and the trans-Atlantic Apollo system.

The agreement all but ends an unhappy partnership between the Australian and Hong Kong incumbent telcos. The two approached the original deal – struck at the height of the dotcom boom – with radically different plans.

For Telstra, the hook-up with PCCW, in which it also bought its mobile arm CSL, allowed it to establish a footprint in fast-growing Asia. But for PCCW, which had just borrowed heavily to acquire the old Cable & Wireless Hongkong Telecom, it was a means of laying off some of its $5b in loans.

Additionally, according to former Reach executives, Telstra International had based its deal on unrealistic projections of the market for international bandwidth.

Compounded with the dotcom meltdown, this meant that Reach's older and small cables were competing with new high-bandwidth subsea cables selling at a much lower cost.

In its early years, as bandwidth prices went through the floor, neither of its parents felt bound to buy exclusively from the JV.

In the last restructure of Reach six years ago the company said all of its inventory would be consumed by Telstra and PCCW.

However, Reach’s greatest service to its owner over the decade was not as a bandwidth provider but as a means of enabling them to slash their debts. In a 2004 deal bankers settled for just $311m of the $1.2b that the two telcos owed them.

The distribution of Reach's assets is expected to be completed in the first half of 2011, Telstra said.