Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« The flaws in the MVNO plan | Main | China telecoms 2013: More web controls, more of the same »
Wednesday
Jan092013

China preps for private MVNOs

China is proposing to open up its tightly-controlled telecom market to privately-owned MVNOs.

A consultation paper issued by the MIIT yesterday sketched out some guidelines for MVNO trials, which would be the first voice or data service to open to privately-owned telecom firms.

But the lack of key details, such as interconnection pricing, and the two-year timeframe for the trials, once more suggests that China has little interest in allowing serious competition to the state-owned incumbents.

The move was foreshadowed last year as the MIIT explored ways of allowing private investment into value-added services, or Type 2 telecoms under Chinese law. Type 1 - or infrastructure ownership - remains exclusively in the hands of the three state-owned operators.

Although the MVNO concept is well-established, with 633 licensed operators worldwide, the paper did not explain why the ministry needs two years to evaluate the service. Essentially an MVNO player needs no more than a brand, a customer care platform, and a deal with an infrastructure owner. There isn't much to test.

Early MVNOs had a high failure rate, mostly because of the high wholesale prices charged by MNOs, but in recent years the market has blossomed. The MIIT paper makes no mention of interconnection pricing or framework, nor does it explain how it would protect incoming players from the incumbents – a glaring omission given the alleged abuses by China’s fixed-line players, and the lack of progress in resolving complaints.

The announcement of the trial, while no surprise, also underlines the MIIT’s disinterest in honouring China’s WTO telecom commitments. Foreign operators can only enter the China market in partnership with an existing operator and with a hefty capital base (some $150-$200 million). Only a small number of VAS areas are open to foreign investors, despite the huge range of VAS services offered domestically.

By contrast, major foreign markets are open to Chinese MVNOs. China Telecom last year won a UK MVNO licence and is planning to expand into other major EU markets.

The MIIT paper did specify that a would-be licensee must have a security management department and must build a “network and information security management system” and an emergency response system.

Chinese website Sohu has nominated internet firms such as Tencent, Baidu, Alibaba were potential licensees. This is pure speculation but, given the limited opportunities in China’s telecom services market, it is unlikely there will be a shortage of firms willing to take a punt on the market.

The MIIT said each individual trial would need to complete within a year. At the end of the trials it would draw its own conclusions and “conduct research into formal MVNO arrangements.”

The consultation period lasts until February 6.  

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>